TPN Correspondent
Andhra Pradesh, Jan 17: Deputy Speaker Mr. Raghurama Krishna Raju has expressed strong discontent over the government's approach to IPS officer Sunil Kumar, who is allegedly involved in the custodial torture case of RRR. In a recent debate on a television channel, Raghurama Krishna Raju raised serious concerns, questioning why the Andhra Pradesh Government had not suspended Sunil Kumar despite his involvement in the controversial case.
Raghurama Krishna Raju pointed out the inconsistency in the government's actions, referring to the suspension of IPS officials in the Jatwani case, and questioning why similar measures had not been taken against Sunil Kumar. "If officials were suspended in the Jatwani case, why not here?" he asked during the debate, emphasizing the need for accountability.
The Deputy Speaker also expressed anger towards TDP MLA Mr. Venigandla Ramu from Gudivada, who has reportedly supported Mr. Tulasi Babu, a key figure allegedly involved in beating RRR during his CID custody. The MLA's stance has raised eyebrows within political circles, with Raghurama Krishna Raju questioning how a TDP MLA could openly back Tulasi Babu, given the serious allegations against him.
There is speculation within the political sphere that the TDP leadership is adopting a softer stance towards Sunil Kumar and Tulasi Babu. The controversy around Venigandla Ramu’s support for the accused further fuels this rumor, raising questions about the possible reasons behind the MLA’s actions.
Some political observers suggest that Mr. Sunil Kumar's alleged refusal to arrest former Chief Minister Mr. Nara Chandrababu Naidu during the regime of Mr. Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy might have contributed to the current political scenario. According to this theory, Sunil Kumar's decision to remain neutral on the issue might have been a factor in his continued position, while Mr. Sanjay was brought in to replace him. This has allegedly led to the TDP Government turning a blind eye to RRR's grievances, adding another layer to the ongoing controversy.
As the case continues to unfold, questions remain about the consistency of the government’s actions and the political influence surrounding the custodial torture allegations.
